Lynette Dixon
In Under the Western Eyes,
Chandra Mohanty explores the Western feminist/Third World Feminist binary and
the homogenizing effect this binary has on the supposed third world woman. She
asserts that Western feminist discourse groups all non-Western women into a
universal category which ignores the vast differences present in the (false)
category. This grouping ignores class, ethnic, geographical, and religious
contexts. Western feminists also tend to ignore the complexity of non-Western
women and often simplify and reduce existence to that which is poor and
uneducated. Mohanty argues that such over-generalization is the cause of the
stratification of the two groups: The Western woman, who is liberated, educated,
and active in the decisions that concern her life, body, and liberation and the
“Third World woman” who is uneducated and a victim in need of salvation. This
brings me to the next binary that Mohanty discusses, active/passive. Rooted in
the culturally imperialist and colonializing nature of the West, the discourse
on non-western women poses them as powerless victims in need of outside
guidance. For example, African and Middle Eastern women are always portrayed as
perpetual victims of patriarchy subject to dependence and subservience. This
places them into a space that is powerless, passive, and unchanging. Such a
limited view of the non-Western world only hurts any chances of unification
amongst all women as the current discourse only serves to oppress. Mohanty
proposes an alternate form of analysis wherein women are seen within their
specific social,
historical, and cultural contexts. She
asserts that non- western cultures are not static or simplistic and those
within these cultures must be considered as active actors of their lives rather
than passive subjects.
Your binaries seem to be very pertinent to the reading and issues we discussed throughout the week! I think it would be interesting to elaborate on how those explicit binaries have implications not only for the minority women but also impact white and Western-educated women. Our ethnocentrism does too many people a disservice, perhaps mostly to ourselves. Also, what are your thoughts on how to change these reductions of character to ethnic and socioeconomic contexts? How does Mohanty address this problem herself?
ReplyDeleteI think there is enough scholarship on how these binaries effect White women and I think that exploring that through Mohanty's work undermines her whole thesis and completely misses the point. I don't think Mohanty discusses how the binaries effect white women at all nor do I think that she should. I actually think that that is precisely what she is trying to avoid. I also don't understand your use of ethnocentrism or your claim about it. Can you please elaborate?
ReplyDelete