I think The
Seriously Erotic Politics of Laughter has to be, hands down, my favorite reading
so far! In this piece, the Willetts discuss how feminist philosophy has been viewed
as a lesser form of theory because of its lacks of universality and mainstream
topics. Moreover, they explain that while men are seen as the humorists or
comedians, it is feminist (or women in general) who are viewed as unfunny, told
to maintain notions of Republican motherhood and chastity, and are merely
reduced to “tits and ass.” In explaining the stereotypes and pressures of
women, the Willetts flip the script and discuss the concept of “fumerist,” a
term coined by writer Kate Clinton to describe a humor that is both “fuming”
and “fun” and “captures the idea of being funny and wanting to burn the house
down all at once” (19). Thus, it is comedians like Roseanne, Tina Fey, Margaret
Cho and Wanda Sykes who understand the limitations of such stereotypes and discuss
their problems in an open, clever way. The Willetts write, “…we argue that
fumerist comedy can make visible the history of identity and the struggles for recognition
and identification, but as a moment of dislocation and transformation. In other
words, the moment of laughter may jolt one out of habitual habits and
cognition, and open up fresh possibilities” (24).
Reflecting back on our previous readings, this piece
reminded me not only of Butler and Athanasiou’s discussion of “biopolitics,”
but also Young’s “Five Faces of Oppression” and the practice of “render[ing]
the particular perspective of one’s own group invisible at the same time as
they stereotype one’s group and mark it out as the Other” in cultural imperialism
(Young, 59). I think, however, what drew me to this piece was its relevance to
the phenomenon that is occurring in our television programs and movies today.
Though we have had shows like Roseanne,
more movies like Bridesmaids and television
shows like The Mindy Project and Girls (a show that I have not seen, but
have read much about) are now showing female comedians throwing these concepts
of motherhood and female respectability out the window. There is a scene in Bridesmaids when Maya Rudolph’s
character literally poops in a wedding dress in the middle of the street (after
eating bad food for lunch). Though this scene could be viewed as vulgar, it is
showing that women can be just as uncouth as the boys. Looking deeper into this
scene, one could make the stretched argument that Maya Rudolph’s character is “shitting”
on the ideas of proper decorum for women and marriage. Nevertheless, the age of
“fumerists” are in full swing and I could not be happier!
This reading was also my favorite so far! I like your use of Bridesmaids and how addresses and smashes the stereotypes attached to women being proper and not vulgar. I think Bridesmaids is also a good example of women in the real world demonstrating the universality of women and their experiences. Often movies with women as the main characters are not seen as viable, because they won’t attract wide viewership from the other sex. I think Bridesmaids proved that not only are women funny in so many ways, taking over the bathroom humor of shitting in the middle of the road usually only associated with men, but they can make a great deal of money, obviously attracting all viewers. There is no excuse to exclude women from all comedic and dramatic lead roles, as our stories are just as relatable and interesting as men’s. Bridesmaids used humor to both break stereotypes through the story told in the movie, as well as demonstrate to a highly corporate industry that women and their stories are just as appealing as men’s to all demographics, and can make money.
ReplyDelete